2020B04 – Audit firm culture, audit quality and other organizational outcomes
Project Number – 2020B04

2020B04 – Audit firm culture, audit quality and other organizational outcomes

What?

What?

This new proposal is a logical extension of the first Audit Research Chair project, and will use the same

Why?

Given the critical importance of culture in facilitating high-quality audits, the contribution of this FAR research proposal is to scientifically examine the current state of organizational culture in audit firms, and to demonstrate whether a firm’s culture is a key driver of measurable organizational outcomes, including audit quality and individual and team indices of employee attitudes, behaviors, and effectiveness.

No related news items found.
This FAR Masterclass explored how audit partners and managers influence team performance and audit quality through personality and leadership behaviors. Research shows that while client factors dominate audit outcomes, partners and managers play a critical role in shaping team climate. Personality traits affect job performance, and leadership behaviors, especially “consideration” and voice modeling, are essential for creating psychological safety and effective collaboration. Managers emerge as key drivers of team commitment and performance, while partners contribute to team identity and safety. The findings highlight the need for strategic pairing of leaders, targeted training, and fostering diverse personalities to strengthen audit quality.
As a knowledgeable non-European, the American professor Jere Francis can provide a relatively objective view on the current developments in the field of auditing in The Netherlands: ‘I think, that if there is a structural deficit, it is not in the organizational aspect of the audit firms, rather than in the limits of the investigative tools of the auditors’.  
This paper synthesizes research on audit firm culture (AFC) over the past decade, reviewing recent developments in research on factors instilling culture in audit firms, and how culture influences audit quality and auditors’ work attitudes. We develop and apply a three-phase model based on prior research and  professional  guidance  (IAASB,  2014),  which  maps  cultural  embedding  mechanisms  (EMs,  visible manifestations and organizational conditions to establish culture), perceptions of existing culture, and consequences of culture. Our synthesis shows that the culture of an audit firm is most oriented toward quality if leadership emphasizes professionalism over commercialism, promotes ethical judgments, and facilitates learning  through  systems,  integration  of  specialists,  and  interpersonal  interactions  among  auditors. The research cited shows strong influence on AFC of tone at the top set by leadership, as well as incentives in performance/reward systems. Studies we review generally imply continued concern for the influence of commercialism on AFC, but future research should investigate whether recent forces (i.e. pressure from regulators and efforts by the firms) have caused a cultural shift toward professionalism. We close by suggesting opportunities for future research that can strengthen understanding how AFC can be better managed by firms.
AFM’s culture initiative aims to improve audit quality by changing internal cultures of audit firms. This initiative is based on the belief that internal culture influences audit quality and can be measured and changed. But there are important challenges, including the ability to measure culture, the link to audit quality, and the assessment of the costs and benefits of cultural changes. It also is unclear whether clients are willing to pay for increased audit costs resulting from cultural changes. To gain insights about audit firm culture, Francis’ research team interviewed senior leaders of the Big Four audit firms in the Netherlands to provide perspectives on their culture initiatives. These initiatives primarily focus on changing partner behaviors, emphasizing (audit) quality, and using feedback mechanisms. “A common concern among all four firms is that the focus on a zero-error culture comes at the expense of innovation and a neglect of the business side of the audit firms’ practices. A singular focus on a zero-error culture is probably not sustainable, given the commercial and business needs of the firms to be profitable.” The paper also outlines challenges specific to instilling culture in audit firms, such as their decentralized nature and reliance on small partner-led engagement teams. Francis proposes to use a survey based on the widely applied Competing Values Framework to measure perception of audit firm culture and assess the success of culture change initiatives.  
No related podcasts found.
No related events found.

Project info

Project Lead

Prof. dr. Jere Francis

Research team

Prof. dr. Ann Vanstraelen
Prof. dr. Olof Bik, RA

Involved University

Timeline

No timeline

Theme(s)

No themes
Project Number – 2020B04

Newsletter

Receive updates on FAR research, publications and events.

Filter projects: 

Project Lead
Theme Filter
University Filter
1 - 10 of 51 projects