›
›
Practitioner Perspectives on Going Concern Opinion Research and Suggestions for Further Study: Part 2—Reporting Environment and the Decision-Making Process

Practitioner Perspectives on Going Concern Opinion Research and Suggestions for Further Study: Part 2—Reporting Environment and the Decision-Making Process

Samenvatting

Auditing researchers rarely engage practicing auditors regarding the phenomena examined, or conclusions reached, in academic research. In an attempt to bridge this gap, we report on the outcomes, insights, and observations from focused interactions with Dutch audit practitioners regarding their perspectives on recent research regarding auditor going concern opinion (GCO) decisions. We provided practitioners with a summary of some of the most salient recent GCO research findings. The goals of our subsequent discussions were to (1) obtain practitioners’ responses to the research findings, and (2) identify relevant issues for future study from the perspective of practitioners. Accordingly, in this second of a two-part sequence of articles, we discuss the outcomes of our interactions with practitioners related to the GCO reporting environment and the GCO decision-making process, as well as directions for future research.

 

Publicatie (PDF)

No PDF available for this publication.

Publicatiegegevens​

Auteur(s)​

Prof. Dr. Anna Gold
Anna Gold
Marshall Geiger
Marshall Geiger
Philip Wallage
Philip Wallage

Betrokken universiteit

Primaire universiteit

Type publicatie

Working Paper

Gerelateerde projecten

No related project

Nieuwsbrief

Ontvang updates over FAR-onderzoek, publicaties en evenementen.