2021B03 – Auditors’ Going Concern Decisions: Insights from Practice
Project Number – 2021B03

2021B03 – Auditors’ Going Concern Decisions: Insights from Practice

What?

What?

Prior research is relatively conclusive on various externally observable (input) factors determining auditors’ GCO decisions (output) and the effects of these (consequences) on various parties in the audit assurance supply chain. At the same time, this prior research has been primarily archival in nature and has thus mostly included publicly available data in the external assessment of the prevalence of GCOs, even though a GCO is the outcome of a complex decision-making process.

As such, we have relatively limited knowledge about key elements of the actual audit and decision process surrounding GCOs. We aim to fill this gap in the literature by conducting in-depth interviews with experienced auditors, thereby aiming to (i) unpack auditors’ GCO decision-making process, (ii) identify key factors that lead auditors to issue, or forego, a GCO, and (iii) establish future research opportunities (some of which we intend to take up in future FAR funding rounds).

Why?

Decisions regarding going concern opinions (GCO) are among auditors’ most important judgments, as GCOs impact the client company, financial statement users, financial markets, and auditors themselves. However, evaluating management’s assertion that an entity will continue as a going concern is also one of the most challenging tasks that auditors perform (IAASB 2015; Bosman, van der Kuip, and Janssen 2021). Against this background, both the IAASB (2020) and NBA (2021b) have launched projects to explore how the auditor’s role and responsibilities can be enhanced in the challenging and complex area of GCO reporting.

No related news items found.
This practice note provides initial insights from an interview study that investigates audit professionals’ decision-making processes regarding their clients’ ability to continue as a going concern. The authors find that these decisions involve the activation of a range of different actors that the engagement leader needs to manage and coordinate. Specifically, auditors need to recognize going  concern as a relevant issue (Phase 1). They then need to negotiate the involvement of their firm’s national office and restructuring specialists (Phase 2). As they conduct the going concern assessment, they mobilize a range of internal and external actors to negotiate management disclosures and the inclusion (or not) of a going concern paragraph in their audit opinion (Phase 3).

Project info

Project Lead

Prof. Marshall Geiger

Research team

Dr. Dominic Detzen
Philip Wallage
Prof. dr. Philip Wallage
Prof. Marshall Geiger
Prof. Dr. Anna Gold
Prof. dr. Anna Gold

Involved University

Theme(s)

Project Number – 2021B03

Newsletter

Receive updates on FAR research, publications and events.

Filter projects: 

Project Lead
Theme Filter
University Filter
1 - 10 of 52 projects