Auditors’ Going Concern Decisions: Insights from Practice

Auditors’ Going Concern Decisions: Insights from Practice

Publication Summary

This practice note provides initial insights from an interview study that investigates audit professionals’ decision-making processes regarding their clients’ ability to continue as a going concern. The authors find that these decisions involve the activation of a range of different actors that the engagement leader needs to manage and coordinate. Specifically, auditors need to recognize going  concern as a relevant issue (Phase 1). They then need to negotiate the involvement of their firm’s national office and restructuring specialists (Phase 2).

As they conduct the going concern assessment, they mobilize a range of internal and external actors to negotiate management disclosures and the inclusion (or not) of a going concern paragraph in their audit opinion (Phase 3).

Publication (PDF)

Publication Info​

Publication Author(s)​

Dr. Dominic Detzen
Philip Wallage
Prof. dr. Philip Wallage
Prof. Marshall Geiger
Prof. Dr. Anna Gold
Prof. dr. Anna Gold

Involved University

No university

Paper Type

Theme(s)

No themes

Related project(s)

Newsletter

Receive updates on FAR research, publications and events.

Filter projects: 

Project Lead
Theme Filter
University Filter
1 - 10 of 52 projects