2023B05 – Unlocking the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Auditing with Effective Management Control Practices
Project Number – 2023B05
Research output

2023B05 – Unlocking the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Auditing with Effective Management Control Practices

What?

What?

The objective of this project is to support audit firms in managing auditors’ process of personal and professional adaptation to AI in ways that ensure the realization of the potential associated with AI. Our approach is rooted in self-regulation theory. In line with this, we propose that the introduction of AI in audit practice requires processes of self-regulation by auditors, i.e., attempts to (1) alter the AI use to re-establish a fit with their personal and professional standards, (2) alter these standards to re-establish the fit with their AI use, or (3) a combination thereof. The outcomes of self-regulation can be both behaviors that contribute and/or impede the realization of the potential of AI in auditing.We argue that the audit firm can mobilize management control practices to assist auditors in their adjustment (as it affects both auditors’ AI use and their personal and professional standards). Specifically, we ask which characteristics these management control practices need to have and in which combinations they will meaningfully contribute to auditors’ processes of adjustment to AI’s use. Moreover, we ask how these processes relate, ultimately, to audit quality and the efficiency of the audit process.In recognition of the relative novelty of AI use in audit practice, we propose to answer the research questions with a multimethod approach in which the findings of the initial interview study inform and recalibrate the subsequent survey and experimental study. Answering our research questions will inform audit practice about (1) how auditors self-regulate to AI; (2) how the audit firm’s existing management control practices impede or support these processes of self-regulation; and (3) how the audit firm’s management control practices can be optimized to support auditors’ self-regulation in ways that ensure the realization of the potential of AI.

Why?

The auditing community has partially welcomed the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a promising way of increasing audit quality and the efficiency of the audit process. Among AI’s many cited benefits are more effective audits and greater speed of the audit process. Consequently, the potential benefits associated with AI use in auditing are high. However, the use of AI may severely disrupt the socio-technical fabric of audit firms. Besides its obvious technical attributes, the introduction of AI is an inherently social process of auditors’ personal and professional adaptation that must be managed carefully by audit firms for AI to realize its promised potential.

What does research say about AI and the future of the auditing profession?

Artificial intelligence is changing the way audits are performed and the skills auditors need to have to succeed. At the 2025 Accountants’ Day of the Royal Netherlands Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA), themed Reality Check!, Anna Gold, Academic Director of FAR, shared her perspective on what research tells us about this transformation. Her message was clear: AI can strengthen critical thinking and support auditors as a valuable partner, but it also raises important questions about trust and professional skepticism. Automation could reduce key learning moments for junior auditors, making lifelong learning and the ability to challenge AI essential. Skills like prompt engineering and adding context will become part of the auditor’s toolkit. Regulators will also need to adapt to evaluate AI-generated outputs effectively. Through FAR’s research, we aim to understand these developments and help shape a strong, future-ready audit profession.
External →linkedin.com
AI Is Transforming Auditing: What Does It Mean for Auditor Identity? Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing the audit profession by improving efficiency and reducing repetitive tasks. At the same time, its opacity challenges a core aspect of the profession: the ability to exercise professional skepticism. This tension is not just technical; it affects auditors’ sense of identity. Our study draws on 30 interviews with auditors, partners, and innovation specialists from Big Four and mid-sized firms in the Netherlands. It explores how auditors normalize AI and make it part of their work. Two main strategies emerged: Framing AI Auditors reinterpret AI as compatible with their values by using historical analogies such as calculators, deflecting responsibility to firms and regulators, and staying actively involved in implementation. Identity Drifting Auditors adjust their self-perception by shifting skepticism to firm-level processes, cultivating error tolerance, and redefining roles across generations. Why It Matters AI offers clear benefits for audit quality and efficiency, but it also risks diluting core competencies like professional skepticism. Successful adoption requires more than technology. It must align with auditors’ values and include transparent, explainable AI. Key Insights You Will Gain • How auditors cope with identity tensions caused by AI • Practical steps firms can take to integrate AI responsibly • Risks and opportunities for audit quality in the age of AI Download this practice note to explore these insights and learn how to manage AI integration effectively.
No related podcasts found.

Project info

Project Lead

Lucia Bellora-Bienengraber

Research team

Jennifer R. Joe
Ann Tank
Sebastian Firk
Martijn Pieter van der Steen
Lucia Bellora-Bienengraber

Involved University

Project Number – 2023B05

Newsletter

Receive updates on FAR research, publications and events.

Filter projects: 

Project Lead
University Filter
1 - 10 of 52 projects