Olof Bik

Professor

Olof Bik is Professor of Auditing & Assurance at the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen. His research focuses on organizational culture, leadership, and governance within the auditing profession, exploring how these factors influence audit quality and professional behavior. He has extensive experience in practice-oriented research and collaborates closely with audit firms to strengthen evidence-based approaches to culture and leadership measurement.Before joining Groningen in 2022, Olof was Professor of Behavioral Research in Auditing at Nyenrode Business University, where he also directed the Accountancy programs and served as Managing Director of the Foundation for Auditing Research (FAR). He worked for 18 years in PwC’s assurance practice, combining professional work with academic research. Olof is a member of the Dutch Accountancy Education Standards Board and has published widely on audit firm culture, professional skepticism, and behavioral drivers in auditing.

What leaders can do to help team members feel safe enough to create a climate of voice in a dual-leader: The manager plays a key role in the team: voice-modeling behavior from the manager has a stronger association than the partner’s behavior. Need for leadership training to help managers demonstrate, through their own “voice” leadership behaviors, that there is an environment of psychological safety that enables voice for the audit team. Managers’ influence is accentuated when they are more involved and avoid mixed messaging (by not engaging in counterproductive RAQ acts). Partner’s voice role modeling may help in absence of the manager, but otherwise has a stifling effect (less actual team voice). More manager involvement cannot compensate for this.

KEY TAKE-AWAYS

Audit firm culture is viewed by regulators and inspectors as the means to enhance audit quality. This study uses the Competing Values Framework (CVF) to explore the culture of
large audit firms, and their attempts to change their cultures. We find that these firms predominantly emphasize a culture characterized by collaboration and control, which is consistent with an inward focus. We also find that audit firms struggle to implement a consistent understanding of culture across their offices and function levels, and there is a gap in how partners perceive culture compared to that of non-partner staff. This “culture gap” has negative consequences on auditors, as larger culture gaps are associated with lower psychological safety and poorer person organization fit. Embedding mechanisms can lower the culture gap, but having adequate resources is far more important of an embedding mechanism than “tone at the top.” The findings underscore the importance of actively communicating and reinforcing stated cultural values, and provide audit firms with a practical tool to diagnose problems in achieving culture change.

This special issue of MAB has been developed in collaboration with the Foundation for Auditing Research and is based on papers and discussions at the FAR conference at Nyenrode University (May 2016).  
← PreviousPage 3 of 3Next →
No related events.

Filter projects: 

Project Lead
University Filter
1 - 10 of 52 projects