2017A01 - Going concern opinions research synthesis (Prof. Geiger)
What?
In this study the team aims at writing a literature review on going concern decisions. The study wants to update, extend what we know about going concern audit opinions. It also wants to identify whether new avenues for research can be identified.
Why?
What are the main determinants, considerations and hurdles for auditors to move on to a going concern opinion? What are the primary stakeholders’ expectation in relation to auditors’ detection and reporting of an auditees going concern risks? What are the determinants of auditors’ effective going concern judgments (e.g., fear of self-fulfilling prophecy)?
Knowledge dissemination:
Routledge Publication of Auditor Going Concern Reporting
FARview #4 met Prof. dr. Philip Wallage en Prof. dr. Jan Bouwens and pdf document
2020 FAR International online Conference Summary
- Presentation - Marshall Geiger (keynote speaker)
- Video
- Follow-up Q&A
FARview #8 Prof. Geiger on COVID-19 and the Going Concern Opinion
Practitioner Perspectives on Going Concern Opinion Research and Suggestions for Further Study Part 1—Outcomes and Consequences
Back to overview-
Project Number
2017A01 -
Research team
Prof. Marshall Geiger
Prof. dr. Anna Gold
Prof. dr. Philip Wallage
-
Involved University
University of Richmond (USA) -
Timeline
09/2017 - 12/2018